I completed form 4473 and started the CA DROS process this afternoon for the Rossi M92 .45 Colt. Unfortunately, this has rekindled my interest for a SAA revolver. Now I want a pistol to match the Rossi M92. As a result I’ve been looking for a stainless steel SSA with a satin finish chambered in .45 Colt.
Hmm…
I briefly entertained Uberti’s reproduction of the S&W top break models, but they were going for $600 or $900 for the blued or stainless model, respectively. Then I thought about Ruger’s line of SAAs since I already own a Single-Six in a stainless steel satin finish. It was a difficult choice between the Blackhawk or Vaquero in .45 Colt.
Do I want modern adjustable sights or the subtle traditional look with a frame notched rear sight?
Looking at the modern sights on the Rossi M92, I wouldn’t mind a Blackhawk. Adjustable sights to compensate for other loads appear to be a benefit, too. Then question was if I wanted a standard grip or Ruger’s version of the Bisley. Noting John Knutson’s review of the Ruger Bisley 5.5″ stainless steel model, the Bisley grip is preferred for hotter loads. I’m not a fan of the traditional pistol grip, so the Bisley model was very attractive considering that I want to share loads with the Rossi M92.
Does Ruger currently produce a Bisley stainless steel model with adjustable rear sights? Of course not. It had to be a limited run of XXX pistols…
Now I’m scoruing gunbroker and other forums. I found one model for sale and it looks promising. Unforunately, I’ll likely have to wait awhile before it’s in my hands. I have a Sig Sauer P239 9mm on it’s way. Why the wait? California has this pesky law called AB 202 – one handgun transfered via FFL per 30 days. :sadface:
Filed under: Firearms, Guns, Just Me | 2 Comments »
xtechnorati


















